Your male bias to the list may not have been intentional, but it does demonstrate that your list is not something one should accept as an "industry standard", or even particularly useful. Why? Because 50+% of the people in the industry you reference are women. By not interacting with women, both as reader and writer, your reporting is at best incomplete, at worst, self-defeating. It signals an intention that you're only interested in interacting with 50% of the target audience.

Perhaps it is not the list that should change.